The balanced scorecard (BSC) is a widely used performance measurement framework for strategic planning. It is so popular, in fact, that The KPI Institute’s latest State of Strategy Management Practice report found that 40% of respondents from Middle Eastern companies were using it. Why is that the case? It’s likely in the name—the BSC offers a balanced perspective of a company’s performance, focusing not just on financial gains but the various aspects of value creation as well. This enables companies who use it to establish sustainable business practices that can meet long-term goals without sacrificing short-term improvements.
What Is the BSC?
In 1992, Robert Kaplan and David Norton dreamed of a better way. Aware of the limitations of traditional practices that focused solely on financial indicators such as return on investment (ROI) to measure a company’s performance, the two designed a tool that incorporated non-financial variables to paint a more holistic, comprehensive picture. Thus, the balanced scorecard was born.
The BSC was further refined by connecting performance metrics directly to strategy, which marked a formal link between strategic goals and performance measurement. In 1996, it became a performance management system (PMS) that effectively integrated the various crucial aspects of an organization—i.e. strategic processes, resource allocation, budgeting and planning, goal setting, and employee learning.
By 2001, the BSC had outgrown its original form, no longer seen as a mere management tool but instead as an all-encompassing strategic management and control system. The BSC has continued to evolve alongside the ever-changing priorities of the business world. In 2021, many companies began integrating environmental and social dimensions into their BSCs to reflect their triple bottom line strategies.
The BSC gives managers a view of the business from four crucial perspectives. Each perspective deals with an integral aspect of the organization and answers a specific question:
Customer Perspective: How Do Customers See Us?
Companies typically have a mission statement that encapsulates how they interact with customers. For example, e-commerce platform Etsy’s mission statement is “Keep Commerce Human.” This sentiment informs the way the company does business, which places importance on leaving a positive economic, social, and ecological impact.
The BSC holds companies accountable to their mission statements by translating them into specific measures that must be followed. For Etsy, one aspect to consider would be the diversity of its workforce, which falls under social impact. To address this, the company has taken measures such as increasing the presence of underrepresented communities in its seller community by interviewing candidates from those backgrounds. This has enabled the company to stay true to its mission and show customers that it walks the talk.
Internal Perspective: What Must We Excel At?
Balance is the primary focus of the BSC—it’s in the name, after all. Thus, the framework doesn’t only take into account the way customers perceive the company, but it also considers what the latter does to shape this perception. This is composed of the various operational and organizational processes that drive the company.
By giving managers an internal perspective, they can identify, track, and measure the processes that yield the most benefits and close the gaps on the ones that fall short.
Learning and Growth Perspective: Can We Continue to Improve and Create Value?
The business landscape is constantly shifting, and in order to keep pace with its changes, businesses must consistently learn and innovate. That is the importance of this perspective, which states that a company’s value hinges on its ability to improve. In any industry, competition can be fierce, which means companies must always find new ways to stand out.
Financial Perspective: How Do We Look to Shareholders?
Among the four perspectives, this is perhaps the most straightforward. Put simply, it indicates if a company is profitable. Although financial performance is no longer the end-all, be-all measure of a company’s success, it still plays a crucial role in determining whether a company is simply surviving or thriving. Shareholders understandably value profitability, and they won’t keep investing in a company that doesn’t produce ROI.
The BSC is by nature a holistic framework, meaning each part is interconnected to the others. This is why it’s important to take a balanced (pun intended) approach when considering the four perspectives. If one side is prioritized over the others, it could lead to the formation or widening of inefficiency gaps that impede business growth and success.
As previously mentioned, the BSC is quite popular. This is due to the myriad of benefits that it brings to organizations that use it wisely. The most obvious benefits of the BSC are twofold. First, it consolidates the seemingly disparate aspects of a business in a single report, leading to increased efficiency in performance reporting and measurement as well as faster decision-making. Second, the BSC helps mitigate suboptimization by making managers consider the entirety of the company’s operational measures, demonstrating whether one objective was achieved at the cost of another.
A more concrete example of the BSC benefiting companies can be seen in how Apple uses the framework. By shifting its focus from innovating its products to also paying mind to customer satisfaction by establishing it as one of the company’s core tenets, the tech giant was able to improve its already stellar reputation by catering to its customers’ desires. Apple also values core competencies, employee commitment and alignment, market share, and shareholder value. Together, these indicators make up the metrics of their BSC.
World-renowned electronic company Philips is also known for its use of the BSC, using a bespoke version of the framework to fit its organizational needs. The company’s focus is on its employees, and it uses the BSC to ensure that each member of its workforce has a clear understanding of the company’s strategic policies and long-term vision.
What Does the Future Hold?
There must be a stronger emphasis on customization as companies realize that there is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all approach to performance management. This aligns with the proliferation of new advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), technologies that must be integrated into the BSC lest the framework fall behind the ever-shifting realities of the business world. Regardless of the future, the BSC appears poised to remain a vital tool for companies of all sizes and in all industries.
Interested in learning more about the BSC? Browse our articles here.
Outstanding performance that can sustain positive results in the future is one of the key elements of organizational excellence.
Considering organizational excellence as what can drive organizations to a brighter future in terms of more profits, cost reduction, more customer satisfaction, referrals, better net promoter score; it is important to highlight the three pillars of the excellence model from the EFQM model 2020; direction, execution and results.
Having this in mind, the model stresses the need for methodological approach where we develop practices and processes, integrate them into the organization towards agile, effective, and efficient execution, in order to achieve better performance results internally (strategic and operational) and externally as perceptions from stakeholders (customers, citizens, and beneficiaries), which can sustain positively in the future.
The third criterion of the model, namely “Engaging Stakeholders,” focuses on ensuring continuous and positive engagement with all key stakeholders of the organization including employees/public servants. Employees are therefore seen as a key stakeholder, and having them as an integral part of any organizational excellence model emphasizes the need to shift the public sector’s focus from the traditional way of operations, in which public servants are only there to process the requests of citizens, try on their own to be energetic and efficient, awaiting their retirement, to a more competitive way, in which they compete with the private sector’s staff in terms of service excellence.
For this shift to happen, the key players are the employees, who will need to feel the need, accept and change towards a different mindset where they consider themselves not just as public servants but as drivers towards the public sector’s and country’s prosperity.
Leaders need to approve such a shift, align it with organizational purpose, direct it internally and externally, support it with the right values, allow change management to tackle all what needs to change step by step, and catalyze it with motivational culture.
A motivational culture can help public servants create ideas to improve, and innovate in the direction of efficiency and agility, so that they can get recognized internally and externally. Motivate them to be proud ambassadors for the country’s welfare. Motivate them so that they can understand and fully believe that they are the primary drivers of success.
Although motivation is one word, thousands of research papers have talked about it! So, let’s get back to the foundation of human beings without further complications: aren’t we survivors? Haven’t we gone through so many crises and changes in this world and made it safely in 2022? Accordingly, the desire to see what tomorrow holds for us and to consider what we may do now to get a greater return tomorrow is what drives us to get out of bed each morning in search of a better tomorrow.
Finally, I would like to refer to the very significant connection between motivation and sustainability. Motivation is one of the components of sustainability, which ensures that resources are preserved for current generations as well as all future ones.
Will sustainability direction, focus and efforts succeed? It will all depend on whether we, people, feel ourselves part of it and we are motivated enough to invest in it. How to feel this way and how to be motivated? Simply by ensuring our sense of belonging and our ability to effect the necessary change, both for our benefit and the benefit of all future generations.
All performance frameworks—whether it is the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), Objectives and Key Results (OKRs), Management by Objectives (MBO) or the Performance Prism—have a shared DNA and purpose: to create synergy in the organization to optimize key results. However, two important questions need to be asked: which performance framework should a company implement and what should one consider when selecting a performance framework?
A well-defined performance framework enables the organization to achieve its desired goals, and having various performance frameworks in hand can make it a bit tricky to choose the right one. Thus, one might be tempted to try implementing what big companies such as Google have implemented and attempt to do the same within their own organization without contextualizing the company culture, size, and business nature.
This article will illustrate the four things to consider when selecting a performance framework for the organization.
Understand your company’s goals and objectives.
It would be silly to start furnishing an empty room without first understanding its intended purpose. Is it going to be for dining or a personal workspace? The same thing can be said when selecting a performance framework. Understanding the company’s goals and objectives is crucial as it will give you a sense of direction. For example, if the company’s goal is to have a disruptive, innovative product or achieve fast growth, then you might consider the OKRs framework as it will enable you to set challenging objectives and provide flexibility to support innovation. On the other hand, if the company’s objectives gravitate toward stability and sustaining the current market share with modest growth, then the BSC is more suitable for this type of environment as it will assist in cascading the objectives from the top down and preserve company status quo while supporting growth at the same time.
Consider the company size and structure.
When we talk about company size, we are not only talking about its capital and asset value, but we are also talking about its workforce size and how they are structured into various functions. If the company has a huge hierarchical structure where each employee is expected to perform a very specific and specialized task that is repetitive and operational, then selecting a framework that exhibits this nature of work will enable the company to create clarity and focus for the employees. A framework to consider for this purpose is MBO, which is defined by The KPI Institute as “clearly setting and defining objectives agreed by both management and their employees.”
Involve internal stakeholders in the selection process.
Highly engaged employees produce substantially better outcomes, are more likely to stay at their organization, and experience less burnout, according to analytics and advisory firm Gallup, Unfortunately, employees can’t reach that level unless they feel that their day-to-day tasks are linked to the company’s purpose and that they have an impact on the results. A good performance framework should be able to convey this to the employees. Asking employees what they value the most and involving them in the decision-making process will result in a highly engaged organization and limit the silo work environment. A performance framework should not be imposed but rather tailored to serve the company’s goals and its human capabilities.
Review and assess the performance framework.
Just like a strategy review, a performance framework needs to be reviewed regularly and not ossified and treated as set in stone within the organization. As the company’s strategy, size, and market grow and change, the performance framework needs to be updated and changed as well.
In conclusion, selecting a performance framework is only the first step. It is a tool for enablement, not a purpose. All performance frameworks can be customized to fit the company’s needs—these are not off-the-shelf products that must be implemented as-is. Nevertheless, other factors play a huge role in executing performance frameworks, such as employee engagement, company structure, and business processes. All these factors influence and impact which framework to select.
This article was written and submitted by Ms. Wedad Alsubaie, who works at the Strategy Management Office of the National Unified Procurement Company in Saudi Arabia.
Culture is an intriguing component of the organizational system, wouldn’t you say?
Although most professionals agree on the importance of building a strong culture, measuring the extent to which this goal has been achieved is quite challenging and tools have been far and few between. One such tool, used to get the pulse of the organizational culture, is provided by the GPA Unit: the performance culture audit.
Another way is to measure specific KPIs, like Sears does. Sears used to monitor % Employees who attended cultural renewal training, while they were in a process of culture change, in ‘96. Other examples of KPIs are % Employees aware of corporate values or # Communications on corporate values, but most of them relate to some quantitative aspect of measurement. Using metrics to monitor performance or inform decision-making is always useful, but can we actually capture our organizational culture in one metric or index?
As culture is a phenomenon that happens naturally in any group, without necessarily being guided, it will always be a reflection of the people’s energy within that group. Culture is more appealing to emotion rather than reason, it is something that can be easily felt when you walk in a company, but it is difficult to explain or justify.
An organizational culture will embed the beliefs and values that define a company and they serve as guidance in daily actions. Culture is a reflection of the company’s spirit and to a large extent, I believe that an organization’s worth is equal to the value of its people.
Performance is a concept usually associated with processes that are more technical than culture, such as financial performance or machinery performance. So why would we want to have a performance-oriented culture? For many people this may sound like a very cold and profit-oriented working environment.
In practice, there are several reasons to embed “performance” within your organizational culture:
Impact on internal stakeholders
Increases accountability regarding the quality of their work;
Raises awareness on the importance of being efficient and result-oriented in their work;
Nurtures constant learning and professional improvement;
Brings clarity on their role and contribution to the organizational strategy;
Increases engagement, by rewarding performance.
Impact on external stakeholders
Positions the organization as a trustful and reliable partner;
Influences the quality of products and services in a positive manner;
Enhances the customer’s experience;
Improves employer brand and market image.
Thus, a change management initiative to shift organizational culture towards a performance-driven perspective, can become quite the leverage for companies wishing to get ahead of their competition.
To have more clarity around how a performance culture looks like, consider the following key attributes:
Shared vision
Strong leadership is essential for any organization. Leaders must have the ability to communicate their vision and inspire employees to follow them. Their vision can be a key liaison that brings and keeps people together, effectively enabling them to work as a team.
Communication
Intense and effective communication increases employees’ awareness and understanding of the company strategy. This impacts the way they work and can help them make better decisions, in full alignment with strategic directions.
Transparency regarding decisions and performance levels establishes greater levels of credibility and confidence in relation to leadership and generates employee interest towards understanding the impact of their actions on bottom line results.
Continuous learning
A culture of performance will act as an enabler for implementing a performance management system within the company. Monitoring performance results facilitates the development of a constant learning process for the entire organization.
A performance-oriented culture not only sets up targets, but also provide employees the necessary training or mentoring to achieve the performance standards set.
Process improvement
A common characteristic of performance-oriented organizations is their concern for constant optimization. By not being satisfied with ”good”, and always striving for ”great”, people adopt a new state of mind, in which they are constantly looking for efficiencies.
Data
In the age of big data, we need to make sure that both young and older generations are accustomed to work and make use of data in their decisions. Modern organizations must have the competencies and the ”habit” of data analysis.
Technology
Progress in today’s business environment is limited, without the support of modern technology. A performance-driven organization will invest in technology to support business processes.
Innovation
Technological growth will be conditioned by the organization’s ability to adapt to market dynamics and innovate in order to stay ahead of the competition. Innovation comes from employees, but what can make a difference between 2 companies that have the same talent pool is the way each manages to nurture innovation among employees.
Rewarding performance
A performance-oriented culture reflects a working environment, where effort and success are acknowledged and rewarded. Rewards don’t have to be exclusively financial.
Engagement
A performance culture should nurture employee engagement, through its employee centered initiatives.
Authenticity
Organizations should be able to identify its uniqueness, acknowledge and promote it among stakeholders. This is what makes a company feel real and meaningful for its employees, customers and business partners. For Zappos, for example, this authenticity is reflected in one of their corporate values – weirdness.
Organizational culture is the unique environment of an organization that is formed through shared beliefs, values, experiences, specific rituals, behavior, interactions, language, and norms. These elements of the culture are developed over time in both visible and invisible ways, such as the organization’s output, interactions, goals, branding, company policies, reward systems, among others.
It is possible that most of the members of an organization are not aware of the origin of their rituals and why they are expected to behave in a specific way. Or they may know exactly what they are doing for what reason and can explain everything with facts. Which of these contradictory approaches characterize your organizational culture more?
Is it a cargo cult organization or “The Credible Hulk”?
Cargo cult thinking in organizations
Cargo cult refers to the belief that a real achievement can be realized by simply imitating visible behavior. This belief exists even without understanding the correlations between the different steps of a process and the consequences of actions.
The origin of this terminology goes back to the first half of the 20th century, when some remote-island-based tribes saw American cargo planes landing on their island. The tribes tried to recreate the different tools and instruments they saw from the cargo planes without knowing how those goods were manufactured. They made radio from stone and wood but without getting the same effect.
This phenomenon can be observed even in advanced 21st century cultures, particularly in the modern corporate world.
Many organizations are adopting the same practices they observe in other companies, such as workplace habits and the design of an office, without fully knowing their impact on the organization. For instance, some companies would place bean bags in the office even if they are hardly used. Some do not observe the business casual dress code on Fridays. And some have ping pong tables.
The paradox is that it is also a rational strategy to follow organizations or people who seem to know what they are doing. When used responsibly, cargo cult thinking can be really useful when making decisions because it saves management a lot of time.
Oversimplification versus overcomplication
Have you seen the meme “The Credible Hulk”? Inspired by the film and the character “The Incredible Hulk,” “The Credible Hulk” is a monster that backs up anything with facts and documents.
The opposite of cargo cult thinking is supporting new initiatives or practices with facts and research. Organizations with this kind of practice are deemed more credible in terms of their innovation practices.
These companies are the ones that look beyond the surface in order to analyze the successful elements of the other innovative organizations, such as Amazon, Apple, and Netflix. They do not just use transparent glass doors because they look good, but also because they want to promote transparency and improve communication in the organization.
However, such an approach is time and resource consuming. Organizations have to justify everything with research, leaving little to no room for instincts and creative innovations that could drive success in the long run.
Cargo cult thinking cannot be completely eliminated. The only way to exclude it from the organizational culture is to learn and know everything, and that is, apparently, impossible. Therefore, organizations could either find the right balance between the two opposite poles or customize their approach based on their goals, the company size, or the nature of their business.
