What Is Strategy? Definition, Types, Process, and Examples

Written by Len on September 17, 2026. Posted in Strategy

Strategy is the set of choices an organization makes about where it wants to go, what it will prioritize, how it will compete, and how it will allocate resources to reach its objectives.

The concept has several established interpretations. Michael Porter describes strategy through competitive positioning and a deliberately different set of activities. Henry Mintzberg presents strategy through five perspectives: plan, ploy, pattern, position, and perspective. The CSBP framework from The KPI Institute also treats strategy as part of a wider performance cycle that connects purpose, objectives, strategic choices, organizational structure, management systems, execution, review, and recalibration.

In practice, strategy answers a deceptively simple question:

What choices must the organization make to achieve the future it wants?

Those choices become meaningful when they influence objectives, resource allocation, initiatives, operating priorities, and performance measures.

This guide explains:

• what strategy means
• how strategy differs from strategic planning and strategic management
• the main types of strategy
• the strategic planning process
• the tools used for strategic analysis
• how strategy moves from corporate objectives to departmental action

What Is Strategy?

Strategy is a coherent set of choices about an organization’s direction, priorities, competitive position, and use of resources.

There is no single definition accepted across the entire strategy literature. A 2024 review of strategic planning research found substantial variation in how strategic planning is defined, particularly in how far the process extends into implementation.

One of the most influential definitions comes from Michael Porter. In his classic article “What Is Strategy?”, Porter distinguishes strategy from operational effectiveness and describes strategy in terms of choosing a distinct position and a different set of activities.

Henry Mintzberg takes a broader view. His 5 Ps of Strategy describe strategy as:

1. Plan: an intended course of action.
2. Ploy: a deliberate maneuver in relation to competitors.
3. Pattern: consistency in decisions and actions over time.
4. Position: the organization’s place in its external environment.
5. Perspective: the organization’s way of seeing the world and acting within it.

The CSBP slides use the Mintzberg 5P model to place strategy across past, present, and future perspectives.

A useful working definition for performance management is therefore:

Strategy is the set of choices that determines the organization’s direction, priorities, competitive position, and allocation of resources in pursuit of its objectives.

What Is Strategic Planning?

Strategic planning is the structured process through which an organization analyzes its current situation, defines its desired direction, makes strategic choices, establishes objectives, and determines the initiatives and resources required to move toward those objectives.

The distinction matters.

Strategy describes the choices.

Strategic planning describes the process used to formulate and organize those choices.

Strategic management covers the broader management of strategy, including formulation, implementation, monitoring, learning, and adjustment.

The distinction also appears in recent research. A 2024 study describes strategic planning as process-oriented, while strategy concerns the fundamental choices made to achieve organizational objectives.

The Cambridge Business English Dictionary defines strategic planning as a process in which executives decide what they want to achieve and determine the actions and resources required to do so.

Strategy vs. strategic planning vs. strategic management

Strategic planning therefore should not be reduced to producing a document. The research literature treats it as a process, and recent work continues to examine how planning connects with implementation, risk, uncertainty, and organizational performance.

Why Does Strategy Matter?

Strategy provides a basis for making choices about priorities, resources, objectives, and action.

Without strategic choices, organizations can accumulate projects and activities without a clear connection to their intended direction.

The CSBP framework places strategy inside a broader performance cycle:

1. Define meaning through mission and values.
2. Define success through vision and strategic objectives.
3. Define strategy.
4. Define the execution structure.
5. Define the management system.
6. Execute, review, and recalibrate the strategy.

This creates a connection between strategy and performance management.

A strategy can therefore influence:

• Which markets an organization serves
• Which customers or stakeholders receive priority
• Which products or services receive investment
• Which capabilities need development
• Which initiatives receive funding
• Which risks require attention
• Which objectives departments receive
• Which KPIs are used to monitor progress
• Which activities are treated as business as usual
• Which new projects require dedicated resources

The OECD’s 2024 work on strategic planning also highlights the importance of translating long-term vision into priorities and connecting planning with implementation.

What Are the Main Types of Strategy?

Strategy operates at several organizational levels. The CSBP framework illustrates a hierarchy that runs from the corporate level through regional, business-unit, functional, team, and employee levels.

1. Corporate Strategy

Corporate strategy concerns the organization as a whole.

It addresses questions such as:

• Which businesses or markets should the organization participate in?
• Where should resources and investment go?
• Should the organization grow, maintain its current position, or reduce its scope?
• Which businesses or activities belong within the corporate portfolio?

Corporate strategy becomes particularly important when an organization operates across multiple businesses, markets, or geographical areas.

2. Competitive or Business Strategy

Competitive strategy concerns how a business competes within a particular market.

Porter’s work places competitive positioning at the center of strategy. The CSBP framework presents several competitive strategy options, including:

• Low-cost, low-price strategy
• Differentiation
• Customer service and relationship strategy
• Networking-effect strategies

Porter’s Five Forces can also help organizations examine the competitive environment through:

1. Existing competitors
2. New entrants
3. Bargaining power of buyers
4. Bargaining power of suppliers
5. Substitute products or services

The central issue is strategic choice. An organization needs to understand the basis on which it intends to compete and whether its activities support that position.

3. Functional Strategy

Functional strategy translates higher-level strategic choices into priorities for functions such as:

• Marketing
• Finance
• Human resources
• Operations
• Information technology
• Procurement
• Research and development

A functional strategy should connect departmental priorities to corporate or business-unit objectives.

The CSBP framework treats this connection as a cascading process. Corporate objectives can be transferred to departments as the same objective when a department owns or directly contributes to it, or as supporting objectives when the department contributes indirectly.

4. Growth Strategy

Growth strategy addresses how an organization intends to expand.

The CSBP slides identify several approaches:

Intensive growth

The organization seeks greater market share within its current geographical market.

Integrative growth

The organization expands across the value chain through approaches such as:

• Backward integration
• Forward integration
• Horizontal integration

Diversification

The organization expands into related or unrelated areas beyond its existing sector.

Internationalization

The organization expands across geographical borders through mechanisms such as alliances, joint ventures, franchising, licensing, mergers and acquisitions, or other international models.

Growth is therefore a strategic choice rather than a single formula.

What Is the Strategic Planning Process?

A strategic planning process usually moves from understanding the organization and its environment to making strategic choices, setting objectives, allocating resources, and executing the resulting initiatives.

The exact sequence varies by organization. The CSBP framework provides a useful integrated structure.

Step 1: Define the organization’s identity

Strategy starts with the organization’s underlying purpose and identity.

This includes:

• Mission
• Values
• Corporate capabilities
• Desired impact
• Vision

The CSBP material distinguishes mission from impact. The impact describes the change the organization wants to create, while the mission describes how it intends to create that change.

Corporate capabilities also matter because strategy depends on what the organization can actually do. The course defines capabilities as the collective skills, abilities, and expertise of an organization.

Step 2: Conduct an Internal Environment Analysis

An internal environment analysis examines what the organization currently has and how effectively it operates.

The CSBP framework examines:

• Processes
• Procedures
• Resources
• Functional and structural perspectives

The analysis asks several practical questions:

What resources do we have?

How well do our processes work?

Which capabilities support our strategy?

Where are the gaps between what exists and what the strategy requires?

The resource analysis covers:

• Financial resources
• Human resources
• Information resources
• Material resources
• Knowledge and expertise

The purpose is to establish a realistic picture of organizational capacity. The CSBP framework describes the internal scan as a way to anchor strategic planning in the current reality and identify gaps between existing and required capabilities.

Step 3: Analyze the External Environment

Organizations operate within environments they cannot fully control.

The CSBP framework separates the external environment into:

• Macro-environment: broad forces outside the organization’s direct control
• Micro-environment: actors and forces involved in transactions with the organization

Several tools can support this analysis.

PESTEL analysis

PESTEL examines six categories:

• Political
• Economic
• Social
• Technological
• Environmental
• Legal

The CSBP process moves through four stages:

1. Identify relevant factors.
2. Identify possible changes.
3. Examine relationships among factors.
4. Assess whether each factor could represent an opportunity or threat.

A 2026 academic review of PESTEL notes that the framework remains widely used across strategic and policy research, while also warning against treating it as a simple checklist. Environmental analysis has limits. It cannot predict the future or remove uncertainty on its own.

That distinction matters. A long list of external factors is not a strategy.

Porter’s Five Forces

Five Forces examines the competitive structure of an industry through:

• Competitive rivalry
• Threat of new entrants
• Buyer power
• Supplier power
• Threat of substitutes

It helps answer a different question from PESTEL.

PESTEL asks: What is changing in the wider environment?

Five Forces asks: What competitive pressures affect the industry’s economics?

The two analyses can therefore complement each other.

Step 4: Use SWOT Analysis Carefully

SWOT organizes strategic factors into four categories:

The CSBP framework distinguishes internal strengths and weaknesses from external opportunities and threats.

SWOT becomes more useful when the analysis leads to strategic questions:

• Which strengths can support strategic objectives?
• Which weaknesses could restrict execution?
• Which opportunities deserve strategic attention?
• Which threats require a response?
• Which strategic objectives should be added because of the analysis?

The CSBP framework makes an important distinction here: SWOT does not create the strategy by itself. Its output is additional strategic objectives that can feed into the strategy tree.

Recent research also continues to examine limitations in conventional SWOT, including subjectivity and difficulty in prioritizing factors.

Step 5: Use Scenario Planning for Uncertainty

Scenario planning considers several plausible ways the external environment could develop.

The CSBP framework distinguishes scenarios from SWOT in an important way:

SWOT examines individual threats and opportunities. Scenario planning considers combinations of threats and opportunities that could produce different future conditions.

A scenario planning process can ask:

1. What major uncertainties could affect the organization?
2. What combinations of factors could produce different future conditions?
3. How would each scenario affect strategic KPIs?
4. Which indicators should management monitor during execution?

Recent research describes scenario planning as a process that develops alternative stories about the future and uses them to challenge current assumptions and develop more robust strategies.

Step 6: Define the Vision

A vision describes the organization’s desired future state.

The CSBP framework defines vision as the organization’s desirable future and describes it as a qualitative statement that defines success.

A useful vision should answer:

What will the organization become?

The vision then gives strategic planning a future reference point.

The CSBP material uses a longer-term horizon for vision and then translates it into objectives at shorter time horizons.

Step 7: Translate the Vision Into Strategic Objectives

A vision is difficult to manage unless it can be translated into specific outcomes.

The CSBP framework uses a sequence:

Vision → long-term objectives → strategic objectives → operational objectives → KPIs and targets.

For example:

Vision: Become a leading regional provider of digital learning.

↓

Long-term objective: Establish a strong regional market position.

↓

Strategic objective: Increase regional market share.

↓

KPI: Regional market share (%)

↓

Target: 20% by 2030

↓

Operational objectives: Annual targets and actions that contribute to the strategic objective.

This translation creates a bridge between strategic intent and performance measurement.

Step 8: Build a Strategy Tree

A strategy tree shows the cause-and-effect relationships among strategic objectives.

The CSBP framework uses a simple question:

To achieve this objective, what do we need?

Each strategic objective should lead logically to the objectives beneath it. The framework asks whether the lower-level objectives are necessary and sufficient to reach the higher-level objective.

A strategy tree can therefore look like:

Vision

↓

Long-term objective

↓

Strategic objective A
Strategic objective B
Strategic objective C

↓

Supporting strategic objectives

↓

Operational objectives

↓

KPIs and targets

This structure gives performance managers a way to test whether the strategy has a coherent logic.

Step 9: Choose Strategic Initiatives

Objectives describe what the organization needs to achieve.

Strategic initiatives describe what the organization will undertake to achieve those objectives.

The CSBP framework connects strategic objectives with corporate initiatives, programs, projects, and organizational structures.

At departmental level, the process includes identifying a portfolio of projects that supports the corporate competitive and growth choices. Each initiative should have its risks, resources, and schedule considered.

This distinction is useful:

Step 10: Cascade Strategy Across the Organization

Corporate strategy has limited practical effect if it stays at the corporate level.

The CSBP framework cascades strategic objectives through organizational levels, from corporate objectives to departments and employees.

At department level, organizations can:

1. Communicate corporate objectives.
2. Cascade relevant objectives.
3. Establish supporting departmental objectives.
4. Identify projects and initiatives.
5. Estimate resources and schedules.
6. Identify risks.
7. Coordinate with other departments.
8. Align departmental strategies with corporate strategy.

This also addresses one of the recurring problems in strategic management: a disconnect between organizational priorities and functional activity.

Strategy Execution: From Objectives to Action

Strategy execution is the point at which strategic choices become organizational activity.

The CSBP framework separates departmental work into two broad categories:

Business as usual

These are ongoing activities that can become part of an employee’s or department’s normal responsibilities.

New projects

These are new undertakings that require dedicated teams, budgets, planning, or other resources.

New strategic projects can then move into more detailed project planning. The CSBP slides reference project charters, work breakdown structures, Gantt charts, resource plans, budgets, and portfolio monitoring.

Strategy execution therefore requires more than a strategic plan. It requires a management system that connects objectives, initiatives, resources, responsibilities, measures, and review.

What Are the Most Common Strategy Frameworks?

Several frameworks are frequently used during strategic planning.

No single framework answers every strategic question.

The appropriate tool depends on the decision being made.

Recent strategic planning research also supports a broader view of the planning process rather than treating individual frameworks as complete strategy methodologies.

What Makes a Strategic Objective Different From a Goal?

A goal can express a broad desired outcome.

A strategic objective is more precise.

The CSBP framework describes an objective as a brief but explicit statement of what the organization intends to achieve as a result of implementing its strategy. It then links the objective to a KPI, target, timeframe, and owner.

For example:

Broad goal:
Improve customer satisfaction.

Strategic objective:
Increase customer satisfaction from 60% to 85% by the end of 2027.

KPI:
Customer satisfaction rate.

Target:
85%.

Timeframe:
End of 2027.

Owner:
Marketing Director.

The additional specificity makes the objective easier to monitor.

Strategy and Performance Management

Strategy and performance management are closely connected because strategic choices determine what the organization intends to achieve, while performance management provides mechanisms for measuring progress toward those outcomes.

The connection can be represented as:

The CSBP deck explicitly places strategy inside the performance cycle and connects strategy with vision, objectives, initiatives, organizational structure, management systems, execution, review, and recalibration.

The OECD’s recent work similarly stresses the connection between long-term vision, priorities, implementation, and review within strategic planning systems.

Common Strategy Mistakes

1. Treating strategy as a document

A strategic plan can document strategy, but the document itself is not the strategy.

Strategy requires choices that influence organizational decisions.

2. Confusing operational improvement with strategy

Improving efficiency can be important. It does not automatically constitute a strategic choice.

Porter’s distinction between operational effectiveness and strategy remains useful here.

3. Treating SWOT as the strategy

SWOT can identify factors that deserve strategic attention. The CSBP framework specifically states that SWOT alone cannot create the strategy.

4. Creating objectives without a strategic logic

A collection of objectives does not automatically form a strategy.

The strategy tree addresses this issue by asking whether objectives are necessary and sufficient to support higher-level objectives.

5. Setting corporate objectives without cascading them

Departmental and individual priorities can drift away from corporate priorities when objectives remain at the top of the organization.

The CSBP planning model therefore includes objective cascading and interdepartmental alignment.

6. Ignoring resources

A strategy that requires capabilities or resources the organization does not possess needs further analysis.

The CSBP internal environment framework treats resources as both strategic inputs and potential constraints.

7. Assuming the external environment will remain stable

Strategic planning needs mechanisms for monitoring external change.

The CSBP framework recommends ongoing environmental scanning and an early-warning system that tracks emerging events and trends.

Strategy Example

Consider a fictional regional professional education organization.

Its vision is to become a leading provider of professional education across Southeast Asia.

Its strategic planning process could look like this:

1. Internal analysis

The organization identifies strong subject-matter expertise but limited regional distribution capacity.

2. External analysis

PESTEL identifies regulatory and technological changes affecting professional education. Five Forces identifies competitive pressure from universities, specialist training providers, and digital platforms.

3. Strategic choice

Management chooses regional expansion through digital delivery and selected local partnerships.

4. Strategic objectives

• Increase Southeast Asian revenue.
• Expand the number of markets served.
• Increase digital course enrollment.
• Develop regional delivery capabilities.

5. Strategic initiatives

• Launch localized digital programs.
• Establish regional partnerships.
• Build a multilingual content portfolio.
• Develop a regional marketing and distribution program.

6. Departmental cascade

Marketing, publishing, technology, finance, and learning teams establish supporting objectives and projects.

7. Performance measurement

KPIs track indicators such as:

• Regional revenue
• Digital enrollment
• Market penetration
• Course completion
• Customer acquisition cost
• Partner contribution
• Revenue by market

The example shows the basic logic of strategy:

Where are we now? → Where do we want to go? → What choices will take us there? → What must the organization achieve? → What must each function do? → How will we measure progress?

Frequently Asked Questions About Strategy

What is strategy in simple terms?

Strategy is a set of choices about where an organization wants to go, how it intends to compete or operate, what it will prioritize, and how it will use its resources to achieve its objectives.

What is strategic planning?

Strategic planning is the process of analyzing the organization’s situation, defining its direction, making strategic choices, setting objectives, and planning the initiatives and resources required to pursue them.

What is the difference between strategy and strategic planning?

Strategy concerns the choices an organization makes. Strategic planning is the structured process used to formulate and organize those choices.

What are the main types of strategy?

Common categories include corporate strategy, competitive or business strategy, functional strategy, and growth strategy.

What are the main steps in strategic planning?

A typical process includes defining organizational identity, analyzing the internal and external environment, defining the vision, choosing strategic directions, establishing strategic objectives, selecting initiatives, cascading objectives, allocating resources, executing the strategy, and reviewing performance.

The exact process varies by organization.

What is a strategic objective?

A strategic objective is a specific statement of an outcome the organization intends to achieve through its strategy. It can be linked to a KPI, target, timeframe, and responsible owner.

What is a strategy tree?

A strategy tree is a visual representation of cause-and-effect relationships among strategic objectives. It shows how lower-level objectives contribute to higher-level objectives.

What is SWOT analysis used for?

SWOT organizes internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats. It can generate additional strategic objectives and strategic questions, but it should not be treated as a complete strategy methodology.

What is PESTEL analysis?

PESTEL is an environmental analysis framework that examines Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal factors.

How does strategy connect to KPIs?

Strategy establishes the outcomes the organization wants to achieve. Strategic objectives translate those outcomes into specific results, while KPIs measure progress toward those results.

How often should strategy be reviewed?

There is no universal review interval. Organizations need a review rhythm that fits their environment, planning cycle, strategic horizon, and rate of change. The CSBP framework includes execution, review, and recalibration as part of the performance cycle.

All About Choices

Strategy is ultimately about choices.

A strong strategic planning process connects those choices to organizational identity, environmental analysis, competitive and growth decisions, strategic objectives, initiatives, resources, and performance measurement.

The core sequence can be summarized as:

Define the organization → analyze the environment → define the future → make strategic choices → establish objectives → build the strategy tree → select initiatives → cascade strategy → execute → measure → review and recalibrate.

Strategic planning gives this sequence structure. Strategic management keeps it connected to organizational decisions and performance over time.

*********

Editor’s Note: This article draws on concepts, frameworks, and references covered in The KPI Institute’s Certified Strategy and Business Planning Professional (C-SBP) course. Learn more about the Certified Strategy and Business Planning Professional course

• Continue Reading

The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Strategic Leadership

Written by Contributor on August 24, 2026. Posted in Strategy

Emotional intelligence in strategic leadership is becoming an important topic in modern management. In the past, leadership was often measured mainly by financial results and decision-making skills. Today, many organizations also look at how leaders manage themselves, connect with their teams, and handle change.

Strategic leaders work in complex environments where they need to align people, resources, and goals. In these situations, technical knowledge alone is not enough. Emotional intelligence helps leaders understand their own emotions, read the emotions of others, and use this awareness to guide better decisions.

For organizations that want to build stronger leadership cultures, understanding the role of emotional intelligence in strategic leadership is becoming increasingly important. This makes emotional intelligence not just a personal trait but a strategic asset: research from the Center for Creative Leadership has found that leaders who show more empathy toward their teams are consistently rated as stronger performers by their own managers.

What Is Emotional Intelligence?

Emotional intelligence is often defined as the ability to recognize, understand, and manage emotions—both in oneself and in others. The concept has become widely used in the fields of psychology, leadership, and organizational behavior, and is now considered an important skill in modern workplaces.

Emotional intelligence is usually described through four main areas. The first is self-awareness, which means understanding one’s own emotions and how they affect behavior. The second is self-management, which is the ability to control emotional reactions, especially in difficult situations.

The third area is social awareness, which involves understanding the emotions and needs of others. The fourth is relationship management, which is the ability to build trust, communicate clearly, and manage conflicts in a healthy way. Together, these four areas form the foundation of emotionally intelligent behavior in the workplace. This four-part structure, often called the Boyatzis-Goleman model, remains one of the most widely applied frameworks for measuring and developing emotional intelligence in professional settings.

Why It Matters for Strategy

Emotional intelligence plays an important role in strategic leadership because strategy is not only about numbers and analysis. It also involves people, relationships, and the ability to guide teams through change. Leaders who understand this dimension can often manage complex situations more effectively.

One area where emotional intelligence supports strategy is decision-making. Strategic leaders often face difficult choices with limited information and high pressure. When they can manage their own stress and stay focused, they may make more balanced decisions instead of reacting emotionally to short-term problems. This connection is supported by recent research: a 2026 study published in Scientific Reports found that emotional-intelligence training measurably improved stress regulation and decision-making performance among professionals in high-pressure roles.

Another important area is leading change. Most strategic initiatives require changes in processes, roles, or culture, and these changes can create resistance among employees. Leaders with strong emotional intelligence are usually better at understanding this resistance, communicating the reasons for change, and building the trust needed to move forward. This is consistent with change management research: Prosci has identified a lack of awareness about why a change is happening as the leading cause of employee resistance, underscoring why clear, empathetic communication from leaders is critical to overcoming it.

How Leaders Can Develop It

Emotional intelligence is not a fixed trait. It is a skill that leaders can build and improve over time through practice and self-reflection. The first step is developing self-awareness. Leaders can do this by asking for feedback from colleagues, keeping a personal journal, or working with a coach who helps them understand their emotional patterns.

The second step is practicing self-management in daily situations. This can include simple habits like pausing before reacting to stressful news, taking time to think before making important decisions, or using techniques such as deep breathing to stay calm during difficult meetings.

The third step is investing in social skills. Leaders can improve their empathy and communication by listening more actively, asking open questions, and paying attention to non-verbal signals during conversations. Regular one-on-one meetings with team members can also help leaders understand different perspectives and build stronger relationships across the organization.

Conclusion

Emotional intelligence is becoming an important skill for strategic leaders in modern organizations. It supports better decision-making, smoother change management, and stronger relationships across teams. Technical knowledge and financial skills remain important, but they are more effective when combined with the ability to understand and manage emotions.

Organizations that invest in developing emotional intelligence at the leadership level are more likely to build cultures where trust, communication, and collaboration support long-term strategic success.

For professionals who want to build the skills needed to lead effectively in complex environments, exploring a certification such as the Certified Strategy and Business Planning Professional program can provide a strong foundation in strategic thinking, leadership, and organizational alignment. These skills are becoming increasingly important in modern strategic leadership environments.

**********
Editor’s Note: The article was written by Ms. Sarah Binsaied.

• Continue Reading

Expert Interviews Series: Rethinking Performance Management in the Age of AI with Dr. Sarah Binsaied

Written by Len on August 5, 2026. Posted in Interviews

For years, performance management leaned heavily on financial results and annual reviews to tell organizations how they were doing. That picture is changing fast, and few people are watching the shift as closely as Dr. Sarah Binsaied.

An Assistant Professor at the Institute of Public Administration in Saudi Arabia, Sarah holds a PhD in Nonprofit Marketing from Brunel University of London. Her work sits at the intersection of strategy, marketing, and organizational performance, and she brings an academic’s eye to questions that most executives only have time to answer on instinct: What should organizations actually be measuring? Which tools still hold up under pressure? And what happens when AI starts making judgments that used to belong to people?

In this interview with Performance Magazine, Sarah shares her perspective on where performance management is heading in 2026, why financial KPIs alone no longer tell the full story, and what leaders and researchers should be paying closer attention to as the field evolves.

Trends

What key trends in organizational performance management have you observed emerging so far in 2026?

In 2026, many organizations are moving away from fixed annual strategic plans toward more flexible and adaptive performance management approaches. This includes rolling forecasts, real-time tracking of KPIs, and goals that can be updated as needed. This shift helps organizations respond faster to market changes, new technologies, and evolving stakeholder expectations.

Which of the existing trends, topics, or aspects within performance management have lost their relevance and/or importance, from your point of view?

Relying only on financial KPIs is no longer enough in modern performance management. Today, organizations need to look at both financial and non-financial measures, such as employee engagement, customer experience, innovation, and sustainability. Financial results usually reflect what has already happened and may not reveal early risks or future opportunities. By using broader performance indicators, organizations can better understand long-term value and build a more sustainable competitive advantage.

What does the corporate performance management system of the future look like?

The future performance management system will rely more heavily on AI and predictive analytics. It will use real-time data and machine learning to identify possible performance gaps before they happen, and it will combine financial and non-financial indicators in a single dashboard. This will help organizations make faster decisions, adjust their strategy continuously, and move away from traditional annual reviews that risk becoming outdated quickly.

What will be the major challenges in managing performance in the future, and how should organizations prepare for them?

The main challenge will be employee resistance to change, especially when AI is used in performance evaluation. Some employees may feel worried or uncertain about these tools. Organizations can prepare by offering continuous digital training, clearly explaining how AI will be used, and building trust. Employees should understand that AI is meant to support their work and decisions, not replace or threaten them.

How is technology impacting the way organizations conduct strategic planning and manage performance? Any specific technology tools you would like to mention?

Technology is changing the way organizations approach strategic planning. Instead of relying only on fixed annual reviews, organizations can now use real-time data and predictive analytics to make faster, more evidence-based decisions. Tools such as Power BI help teams display KPIs clearly, connect data across departments, and spot performance trends early. This supports more flexible strategic planning and allows organizations to adjust decisions as new information emerges.

How is sustainability impacting the way organizations conduct strategic planning and manage performance? Any specific sustainability aspects you would like to mention?

In Saudi Arabia, sustainability is becoming an important part of strategic planning, especially because of Vision 2030. Organizations are now expected to measure ESG indicators, covering environmental, social, and governance aspects, alongside financial KPIs. This means tracking environmental impact, social contribution, and governance practices. As a result, sustainability is no longer just about meeting requirements; it is becoming a key factor supporting long-term performance and strategic success.

Practice

What should be improved in the use of strategy and performance management tools to make an organization even more resilient to future crises?

Strategy and performance tools should build in risk scenario planning as part of the core strategic framework, not as a separate activity. This means using scenario analysis, stress-testing, and contingency KPIs when building plans. Doing so helps organizations spot possible risks and disruptions earlier, adjusting their strategies before a crisis hits rather than reacting once the problem has already become serious.

While navigating through these challenging times, what would you consider a best practice in performance management?

A good best practice is involving employees in setting goals and KPIs, rather than assigning targets from the top alone. When employees help create the targets, they feel greater ownership and motivation, and the goals become more realistic, especially in uncertain situations. This approach also helps leaders draw on frontline insights, improving both employee engagement and the quality of performance measures.

How does benchmarking support the improvement of performance management and target-setting systems?

Benchmarking helps organizations understand where they stand compared with others in the same industry. Instead of setting targets based only on internal assumptions, they can draw on real examples from high-performing organizations. By comparing results, processes, and practices, organizations can identify performance gaps and areas for improvement. This also helps them set more realistic, informed targets while learning from strategies that have already proven successful.

Research

Which organizations would you recommend observing due to their approach to managing performance and its subsequent results? Why?

I recommend looking at Saudi Aramco, because it combines strong performance management with long-term strategic planning and operational excellence. The company uses structured KPIs across different business units, supported by clear governance and a culture of continuous improvement. This makes Aramco a useful example for understanding how large, complex organizations manage performance effectively and align daily operations with strategic goals.

What aspects of performance management should be explored more through research, given their importance in practice?

More research is needed to understand how employee wellbeing affects long-term organizational performance. Many studies focus on short-term productivity, but it is still unclear how wellbeing programs create lasting results over time. Organizations need stronger evidence on whether these initiatives lead to real performance improvement or only temporary benefits, especially since the impact may differ across industries, workplaces, and organizational cultures.

What are the key competencies of a successful business leader (C-level executive)?

Successful C-level executives need strong emotional intelligence and the ability to lead change in a clear, supportive way. They should understand employees’ feelings during transitions, communicate the vision simply, and build trust across the organization. Emotional intelligence helps leaders manage resistance, motivate people, and create commitment, making change more sustainable rather than dependent solely on top-down decisions or pressure.

What are the key competencies of a strategy and performance manager to succeed nowadays?

Nowadays, a strategy and performance manager needs strong communication skills and the ability to influence people at different levels of the organization. This role is not only about analyzing data but also about explaining it clearly and usefully. When managers can turn complex strategic information into simple messages for executives, middle managers, and frontline employees, they help create alignment, support, and better strategy execution.

• Continue Reading

Charting a Course: A Step-by-Step Guide to Deliberate Strategic Planning

Written by Andrei Costea on July 27, 2026. Posted in Strategy

In their 1985 paper “Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent,” Henry Mintzberg and James A. Waters describe strategic planning as a continuum. There is deliberate strategic planning on one end and emergent strategic planning on the opposite.

Deliberate strategic planning represents a structured, systematic approach to strategy development that emphasizes a planned, intentional, and coherent process whereby organizations set clear objectives and design strategies to achieve them. This approach presupposes a stable environment where goals and actions align closely.

On the other hand, an emergent strategy is more adaptive, arising from patterns of action rather than premeditated plans. While emergent strategies thrive on flexibility and responsiveness, deliberate strategies emphasize clarity, predictability, and alignment with long-term objectives.

Despite the growing popularity of emergent strategic planning, the deliberate approach remains vital for corporations aiming for sustainable success. One of its core strengths lies in the distinct roles it ascribes to top management and middle managers. In the deliberate process, top management acts as architects of the strategy, setting overarching goals and ensuring alignment with the organization’s vision, while middle managers focus on operationalizing these strategies and managing their implementation.

Read More >> Strategic Alignment: A Key Factor for Business Success

The Four Phases of Deliberate Strategic Planning

As outlined by J. Scott Armstrong in his paper on the importance of value planning in making strategic decisions, deliberate strategic planning unfolds in four distinct phases, with each phase contributing to securing stakeholder commitment. Before diving into these phases, it is important to recognize that historical data serves as one of the cornerstones of the process. Organizations rely on their data repository to provide past performance metrics and external trends.

Top management can utilize historical data to identify patterns, trends, and benchmarks, which they can then use to design actionable plans. Meanwhile, middle managers can use this data to refine tactical operations, ensuring that daily activities align with strategic objectives. Having a robust data architecture not only allows a company to more accurately analyze what has happened but also to forecast future trends, mitigate risks, and design strategies grounded in evidence rather than conjecture. With this foundation, organizations can proceed through the deliberate strategic planning phases with clear direction.

• Defining Long-Term Objectives: The first phase involves defining the company’s long-term goals or ultimate objectives. These goals must align with the aspirations and priorities of various stakeholders, such as employees, investors, and customers. Tools like stakeholder analysis can identify key interests and concerns, while SWOT analysis evaluates the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Furthermore, in later stages of this planning process, the use of SMART criteria—specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound—ensures the clear statement and actionability of goals. By integrating these tools, companies create a foundation for a cohesive strategic vision that resonates across all stakeholder groups.

• Generating Strategies: The second phase centers on generating strategies and alternative approaches to achieving these long-term goals. Companies must consider comprehensive strategies that incorporate slack resources—such as additional time, finances, or facilities—to account for uncertainty and enhance the plan’s flexibility. Generating alternative strategies is a crucial practice that bolsters adaptability. Techniques such as brainstorming sessions, unstructured group meetings, and scenario planning encourage creativity and provide contingency options. This phase ensures that the organization has a repertoire of well-thought-out strategies ready to deploy, even in dynamic or unpredictable environments.

• Evaluating Strategies: After developing strategies and alternatives, the third phase evaluates their feasibility in relation to the first phase’s objectives. This evaluation process ensures that the proposed strategies are realistic, effective, and aligned with the company’s mission. Methods such as checklists, the Delphi technique, and the Devil’s Advocate approach provide structured ways to scrutinize strategies. For instance, a checklist can ensure that all critical factors, such as resource availability and market conditions, are considered. The Delphi technique harnesses internal expert consensus, whereas the Devil’s Advocate method identifies potential flaws or risks. This rigorous evaluation phase narrows down the list of strategies to those most likely to succeed.

• Strategy Monitoring and Implementation: The final phase involves systematically monitoring the results of implemented strategies. Companies should establish a feedback system with clearly defined intervals—such as quarterly or semi-annual reviews—to assess performance and make necessary adjustments. This system must account for changes in external factors, such as economic, technological, geopolitical, and social shifts, as well as internal factors like evolving strengths, weaknesses, and competitive actions. Key performance indicators (KPIs) serve as a critical tool for monitoring progress, enabling organizations to measure outcomes against predefined benchmarks. Integrating KPIs into the company’s performance management system and linking them to the organizational incentive system ensures accountability and motivates stakeholders to align their efforts with strategic goals.

Securing Stakeholder Commitment

A deliberate plan significantly enhances a company’s ability to secure stakeholder commitments throughout the process. A well-structured plan not only communicates the company’s long-term objectives but also fosters a sense of ownership among stakeholders. For instance, engaging stakeholders in the development of alternative strategies allows them to voice their concerns and align their interests with the organization’s goals.

Similarly, an accurate feedback and monitoring system ensures transparency, showing stakeholders how their contributions influence outcomes and incentivizing them to remain invested in the strategy’s success. This is especially crucial in large corporations where the different parts of the organization must work in alignment with the organization’s objective.

Strategic Foundation 

Deliberate strategic planning remains an indispensable tool for organizations, offering clarity, structure, and alignment in an increasingly complex business environment. While emergent strategies provide flexibility and responsiveness, deliberate strategies establish a solid foundation that guides decision-making and ensures consistency.

Read More >> The Circular Economy Model: Developing Environmental and Organizational Long-term Value

Technology such as big data further enhances this process by equipping organizations with more comprehensive and timely datasets to generate actionable insights, maintain advantages, and refine strategies with greater precision. Furthermore, many companies could benefit from leveraging both approaches, enabling top management to define clear objectives while empowering all levels of management to adapt and innovate. This integrated approach ensures that organizations remain resilient, adaptable, and primed for success in the face of evolving challenges.

• Continue Reading

A Strategic Lexicon: Comparing Key Concepts

Written by Kimberly Tilar on July 27, 2026. Posted in Strategy

In an age characterized by rapid technological advancements and market shifts, the importance of strategy—whether corporate or business—cannot be overstated. A well-defined strategy is a roadmap that guides organizations through complex market dynamics and helps them identify opportunities while mitigating risks. Effective planning and execution of this roadmap hinges on a thorough examination of its core concepts. This approach starts with a clear understanding of the relevant terms as well as how concepts differ, complement, connect, and contribute to the entire process.

Business Strategy and Corporate Strategy

Both business strategy and corporate strategy are essential for a company’s success. However, they differ significantly in scope, focus, and decision-making levels.

Business Strategy

Business strategy encompasses the methods an organization employs to achieve its goals within a specific business unit. It serves as a framework for generating value through the production and delivery of goods or services while focusing on effective competition within a particular market. This strategy includes allocating resources to execute the chosen approach as well as making decisions regarding the capabilities and activities crucial for market success. By concentrating on specific units, business strategies enable organizations to respond smoothly to market changes and customer demands.

Corporate Strategy

Conversely, corporate strategy outlines the overall plan for a corporation with multiple business units, focusing on achieving objectives at the highest strategic level. This broader approach manages the business portfolio to create value and ensure alignment with the corporation’s vision. It involves making critical decisions about where to compete across various industries and markets, including which businesses to enter or exit and considerations regarding diversification and strategic alliances. This high-level perspective is essential for guiding the organization toward sustainable growth and profitability.

Despite their differences, both business and corporate strategies are vital for a corporation’s overall success. Combined, they serve as a comprehensive framework for navigating the complexities of the modern business landscape.

Read More >> Democratizing Strategy Planning to Improve Employee Engagement

Vision Statement and Mission Statement

Vision and mission statements serve distinct but complementary purposes, together forming a comprehensive framework for an organization’s direction.

Vision Statement

A vision statement articulates an organization’s long-term aspirations and desired future state. It inspires stakeholders by outlining what the organization aims to achieve in the future. Typically broad and aspirational, vision statements paint a clear picture of ultimate goals. For instance, Rockwater Energy Solutions’—a subsidiary of Brown & Root/Halliburton—vision statement is “As our customers’ preferred provider, we shall be the industry leader in providing the highest standards of safety and quality to our clients.”

Mission Statement

In contrast, a mission statement defines the organization’s current purpose and the specific actions it takes to achieve its objectives. It outlines what the organization does, who it serves, and how it operates daily. Mission statements are more concrete and focused, often detailing core values and guiding principles. For example, LinkedIn’s mission is “to connect the world’s professionals to make them more productive and successful.”

Together, the vision statement establishes long-term goals while the mission statement describes current objectives necessary to achieve those goals. This dual framework guides organizational activities and aligns stakeholders toward a common purpose.

Strategic Planning and Operational Planning

Synchronizing strategic planning and operational planning promote consistency in decision-making, but they serve different purposes and focus on varied timeframes.

Strategic Planning

Strategic planning involves outlining the future direction of an entity, which can be an organization, department, or individual. This process includes identifying goals and determining the methods to achieve them.

Typically spanning three to five years, strategic planning is a long-term process that evolves, allowing for annual adjustments. This plan is developed by top management, including the leaders, board members and other executives, while considering the external business environment, such as competition and market trends.

For a strong strategy, strategic planning should adopt a systematic approach. This includes clarifying the organization’s current state, analyzing the external environment, defining its mission and values, developing strategic themes, setting objectives with key performance indicators (KPIs), identifying initiatives, and regularly reviewing the strategic plan to ensure alignment and adaptability.

Operational Planning

Operational planning supports the strategic plan by aligning day-to-day activities with tactical execution. It plays a crucial role in achieving organizational goals through detailed short-term plans specific to departments. An effective operational plan includes several essential characteristics to ensure successful execution. It starts with an introduction and situation report, followed by an overview of tasks, objectives, and overarching goals.

The plan outlines the methods to be used, necessary resources (personnel, equipment, and supplies), and timelines with benchmarks and milestones. It defines the administrative structure, operating budget, and funding acquisition strategy. Roles and responsibilities are clearly specified, including required competencies for personnel. Monitoring mechanisms are established with relevant indicators. Finally, the plan includes provisions for reporting, all contributing to a comprehensive framework that aligns daily operations with strategic objectives.

SWOT Analysis and PESTLE Analysis

SWOT and PESTLE analyses are strategic tools designed to evaluate the internal and external forces affecting organizations. By using SWOT analysis to examine an organization’s internal capabilities and PESTLE analysis to assess its external environment, organizations can develop strategies to proactively address challenges and effectively plan for future initiatives.

SWOT Analysis

SWOT analysis identifies an organization’s internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats. This assessment informs strategic decisions by emphasizing strengths, addressing weaknesses, and capitalizing on opportunities while mitigating potential threats.

PESTLE Analysis

PESTLE analysis evaluates external factors influencing an organization, including political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental aspects. This framework helps assess a company’s objectives by identifying and analyzing crucial drivers of change in the external environment.

Both SWOT and PESTLE analyses serve as effective starting points for strategy formulation, offering valuable insights for business development and marketing efforts. Conducting these analyses enhances an organization’s understanding of its competitors and provides the insights necessary to gain a competitive advantage. Approaching them requires realism and attention to detail.

OKRs and the BSC

After defining their strategies through strategic and operational planning, organizations must measure progress effectively. Both objectives and key results (OKRs) and the balanced scorecard (BSC) follow a similar process of setting objectives, tracking progress, analyzing results, and making data-driven decisions.

OKRs and the BSC emphasize the importance of establishing clear objectives, promoting transparent communication about goal achievement, serving as strategic tools, and ensuring measurability across all organizational levels. This approach enables the effective communication of priorities throughout the organization.

Objectives and Key Results

OKRs are a goal-setting framework that organizations use to define and track their objectives and associated outcomes. The objectives component outlines what an organization aims to achieve, while the key results specify measurable outcomes indicating progress toward those objectives.

While both OKRs and the BSC are strategic management tools, they differ in several key aspects. OKRs prioritize ambitious, aspirational goals and encourage a bottom-up, decentralized approach to goal-setting and achievement. They often have a shorter-term focus, with quarterly reviews and adjustments. Additionally, OKRs emphasize intrinsic motivation and empower teams to take ownership of their work.

Furthermore, OKRs are best suited for organizations that thrive on innovation, agility, and employee empowerment. They are ideal for fast-paced, dynamic environments where adaptability is key. By focusing on ambitious goals and empowering teams, OKRs can drive significant growth and transformation.

Balanced Scorecard

In contrast, the BSC is a framework aimed at managing strategy in a balanced way across four key perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. It offers clarity regarding strategy and ensures that activities are aligned with strategic objectives.

The BSC typically focuses on more traditional, top-down, and centralized approaches to strategic planning and execution. They often involve longer-term objectives and KPIs, and they prioritize a balanced perspective that considers various aspects of value creation. While OKRs are more flexible and adaptable, the BSC provides a more structured and standardized framework for strategic management.

The BSC is well-suited for organizations that prioritize stability, control, and long-term planning. It is particularly effective in regulated industries or large, complex organizations that require a structured approach to performance management.

Read More >> Charting a Course: A Step-by-Step Guide to Deliberate Strategic Planning

Shared Understanding

Knowing the differences between them will enable organizations to choose the right tool for the job and collaborate smoothly, eliminating uncertainty and driving efficiency. With this collective understanding, organizations can steer their roadmaps with goal-driven direction and purposeful synchronization.

• Continue Reading