Get the opportunity to grow your influence by giving your products or services prime exposure with Performance Magazine.

If you are interested in advertising with Performance Magazine, leave your address below.

Advertise with us

Posts Tagged ‘Business Performance’

Expert Interview Series: Balancing People, Performance, and Growth with Mariham Magdy

FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedin

In high-stakes industries like oil and gas, human resources (HR) is more than an administrative function; it’s the engine of operational stability.  With over 18 years of corporate experience, Mariham Magdy has built a career navigating the high-pressure demands of this field. As a facilitator for The KPI Institute, she leads the Certified Employee Performance Management Professional, empowering practitioners to bridge the gap between individual output and departmental goals.

A versatile expert, Magdy also delivers the other certifications: Certified KPI Professional, Certified Strategy and Business Planning Professional, Certified Balanced Scorecard Management System Professional, Certified Agile Strategy and Execution Professional, and Certified Strategy and Performance Maturity Assessment Professional. Moreover, she is an award-winning researcher, receiving the Best ROI Article 2018 award from the ROI Institute for her contributions to the field. 

In this feature, Magdy shares her approaches to professional development. She explores how leaders thrive in fast-paced environments by treating individual strengths as milestones in a larger narrative. By moving beyond one-size-fits-all briefings, Magdy provides a roadmap for integrating employee well-being into performance discussions to ensure that measurable results never come at the cost of the individual.

Can you describe your current role and how your daily responsibilities relate to HR strategy and performance management?

I’m deeply involved in a wide range of HR functions. I’m a strategic HR leader in end-to-end recruitment, ROI-driven talent initiatives, and organization design. By integrating sophisticated selection tools like Competency Based Interview (CBI) and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), I align human capital with business objectives. My expertise spans HR governance, total rewards, and leadership development (GLA 360), ensuring operational compliance and a sustainable competitive advantage for global clients.

Have you worked in fast-paced or high-pressure environments? If so, can you describe your experience? If not, how do you think employee growth should be included in performance discussions without losing focus on operational results?

Yes, I do have extensive experience thriving in demanding settings, particularly within the oil and gas industry, which is known for its dynamic and high-pressure nature. I have over 18 years of corporate experience, starting from building HR departments from scratch to managing all HR functions. 

My experience spans from handling HR operations in the oil and gas sector, including offshore personnel coordination. This has required me to respond swiftly and effectively to unexpected challenges, ensuring both operational continuity and support for the team. Furthermore, leading strategic management and planning initiatives has allowed me to align HR practices with business needs in rapidly changing environments, while implementing performance systems and KPIs that have ensured organizational goals are met even under pressure. 

Moreover, delivering training to various management levels in fast-paced sectors has allowed me to maintain quality and engagement, even when timelines are tight.

With your experience in HR, consulting, and training, how do you see the connection between individual development and organizational goals?

In today’s dynamic business environment, organizations are constantly seeking ways to align their strategic objectives with the evolving needs and aspirations of their workforce. 

I see the connection between individual development and organizational goals as a catalyst for sustainable growth and innovation for both the organization and the individual. When people see clear pathways for advancement and understand how their growth aligns with broader company goals, they are more likely to innovate and go the extra mile. 

Our role then as organizations and learning and development (L&D) professionals is to integrate personal development plans with organizational KPIs. Thus, leaders can transform their teams into engines of achievement and resilience.

When setting performance expectations, what approaches help clarify goals while reflecting each employee’s strengths?

Imagine a team meeting at the start of a new quarter. Instead of delivering a one-size-fits-all briefing, the manager gathers everyone and begins with a question: “What does success look like for each of you, and how can your unique talents help us get there?” 

As each team member shares their perspective, the manager listens intently, making note of individual strengths and weaving them directly into the team’s targets. By breaking down overarching objectives into personalized, strength-based tasks, everyone feels seen and valued. Over time, these goals become more than mere metrics; they transform into milestones in an ongoing story where each person’s specific abilities move the team forward. 

I always love to apply Steve Jobs’ philosophy with my team: “We don’t hire smart people to tell them what to do, we hire smart people to tell us what to do.”

How do you identify the competencies that matter most for employees in different functions, such as training, consulting, or corporate HR?

Identifying the right competencies for employees in diverse functions like training, consulting, and corporate HR starts with understanding both the unique demands of each role and the broader goals of the organization. 

The key is to combine data-driven methods—such as analyzing top performers and collecting feedback from stakeholders—with an appreciation for the evolving landscape of each function. We also have to review job requirements, stay attuned to industry trends, and invite input from employees themselves to ensure that competency frameworks remain relevant and empowering across all areas.

How do you align employee behaviors with performance criteria while keeping assessments flexible and practical?

Leaders should start by clearly articulating what successful behaviors look like in the context of specific roles and team objectives. These criteria should be transparent and directly linked to the company’s values and goals, ensuring that everyone understands how their work and behaviors contribute to the big picture.

To keep assessments practical, organizations can incorporate regular check-ins, peer feedback, and self-reflection opportunities. This creates a dynamic feedback loop where employees are empowered to adjust their approach and see how their behaviors drive results. Flexibility then comes from recognizing that excellence may manifest differently across individuals and situations. As such, performance criteria should allow room for creativity and personal strength.

Based on your experience, what role do informal feedback and day-to-day interactions play in helping employees reach their performance goals?

Let’s imagine a typical scenario that we witness: a busy office where, between project deadlines and team meetings, small conversations happen in the hallway or over coffee. These everyday moments of feedback, often spontaneous and genuine, create a culture where improvement feels natural and supportive rather than intimidating. When employees know their efforts are recognized in real time, they’re more likely to adjust behaviors, reinforce positive habits, and stay motivated.

Informal feedback acts as a compass, keeping everyone on course toward their performance goals, one conversation at a time. 

How do you balance structured evaluation processes with opportunities for personal growth for employees?

Structured evaluations, such as annual reviews, goal setting, and competency frameworks, provide clarity and consistency in measuring performance. However, these formal processes must be complemented by avenues for personal growth that acknowledge each employee’s unique talents and aspirations. This could be by encouraging employees to pursue stretch assignments or by allowing space for mentorship, skill-building workshops, and self-directed projects that foster creativity and initiative. 

I believe that managers can use performance check-ins to discuss both progress on specific targets and areas where the employee wishes to grow. This dual focus helps employees feel valued for their achievements and empowered to shape their own professional journeys.

When planning development initiatives, what factors guide your choices about which skills or behaviors to focus on?

I prioritize skills and behaviors that not only address current performance gaps but also anticipate future challenges, such as technological changes or shifting client expectations. Gathering input from employees and managers helps ensure that our focus areas are relevant and impactful. This creates opportunities for growth that are meaningful and aligned with our business objectives.

How do you measure progress in employee development beyond standard metrics?

I look for signs such as increased initiative, adaptability to new challenges, and a willingness to take on stretch assignments. Qualitative feedback from peers and managers, examples of creative problem-solving, and evidence of willingness to mentor others are strong indicators of development. 

Additionally, I consider how employees pursue self-directed learning, seek feedback, and contribute to a positive team culture. These factors help paint a fuller picture of professional growth that metrics alone cannot capture. 

From your perspective, what trends in performance management are influencing HR practices in Egypt and the wider region today?

In Egypt and the wider region, performance management is increasingly shifting toward continuous feedback and development-focused conversations rather than relying solely on annual reviews. There is also a growing emphasis on leveraging technology platforms to streamline performance tracking and data-driven decision-making, which makes the process more transparent and accessible for both employees and managers.

Additionally, there is a trend toward integrating employee well-being and engagement metrics into performance discussions, reflecting a more holistic approach to talent management. As companies are increasingly recognizing the importance of aligning individual and team objectives with organizational strategy, they are focusing on building a culture of continuous learning and adaptability to remain competitive in a rapidly evolving market.

How do you manage the balance between meeting immediate targets and developing longer-term skills in your teams?

I encourage team members to identify learning opportunities within their current projects, so that skill-building becomes part of daily work rather than a separate activity. I also support both the achievement of business objectives and the cultivation of future capabilities within the team

When employees have high autonomy, what practical steps help maintain accountability and alignment with performance expectations?

When employees have high autonomy, it’s important to establish clear goals and regularly communicate expectations to ensure accountability and alignment. Setting measurable criteria, along with frequent check-ins or progress reviews, helps maintain focus and provides opportunities for feedback. 

Additionally, fostering a culture of transparency—where team members openly share updates and challenges—encourages mutual responsibility and ensures everyone remains aligned with performance standards.

From your experience, how should feedback be structured to support learning and measurable performance outcomes?

By including well-being and engagement measures, organizations can promote continuous learning, adaptability, and a culture of shared responsibility. Effective feedback in high-autonomy teams should be clear, timely, and actionable, focusing on specific behaviors and measurable outcomes while fostering open dialogue and a growth-oriented mindset.

What strategies work best for keeping motivation and engagement when teams face heavy workloads or tight deadlines?

When teams encounter heavy workloads or tight deadlines, maintaining motivation and engagement hinges on several key strategies. It begins with the clear communication of priorities, which helps individuals focus on the most critical tasks and reduces overwhelm. To sustain this focus over time, breaking large projects into manageable milestones and celebrating small wins can sustain momentum and reinforce progress. 

Additionally, regular check-ins support sustaining the efforts in order to acknowledge effort, offer support, address challenges, and create a supportive environment that values both results and well-being.

Throughout your career, which leadership practices have had the greatest impact on employee performance in demanding work settings?

We can summarize leadership practices that have the greatest impact on employee performance in three simple steps: setting clear expectations, communicating priorities effectively, and fostering an environment of open dialogue. 

Additionally, recognizing and celebrating incremental achievements sustains engagement and reinforces progress even during high-pressure periods. Promoting transparency around workload and inviting team input also empowers employees to co-create solutions, building trust and a sense of shared responsibility.


**********

Inspired by Mariham Magdy’s perspective on aligning employee growth with organizational performance?

Take the next step with The KPI Institute’s Certified Employee Performance Management Professional course—where you might have the opportunity to learn directly from her as a facilitator.

The Distance Between Saying and Doing Strategy

FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedin

Organizations seldom fail because they don’t have an actual strategy in place – most do have some form of strategy in place. 

They fail because the strategy, even if well-conceived and meticulously documented or hap-hazardly strewn together and poorly executed, is rarely acted upon with the required rigor and intent. 

After a glossy presentation ends and the strategy is launched, what is truly required is for the responsibility for executing the plan to percolate through various departments and teams.

What most leadership teams fail to appreciate is the delicate nature of strategic alignment: a strategy that seems utterly clear in the boardroom can quickly become contradictory once responsibility is shared with those charged with bringing it to life. 

Somewhere in between executive vision and operational reality, the signal degrades. Workflows and priorities shift, messages become unclear, managers become overwhelmed, and ultimately, teams disengage from plans they can no longer grasp.

The outcome doesn’t necessarily lead to explosive, grand failure; actually, it’s insidious organizational drift efforts that everyone is expounding on, but likely not toward the same outcome.

Several recurring patterns are common here. Executive assumptions, communication failures, bottlenecks at the middle-management level, inconsistency, and the ever-present temptation to make constant pivots all chip away at effective execution. For any organization that truly wants to turn strategy into action, recognizing and addressing these patterns is the critical first step.

Executive Assumptions About Understanding Strategy That They Don’t

The most pervasive executive blind spot is equating communication with understanding. 

Leaders spend months doting over strategic objectives, perfecting presentation materials, aligning budget priorities, and devising rollout plans. 

By the time the strategy is shared internally during a gathering, leaders understand it better than anyone, knowing every single minutiae and detail. However, everyone else only learns about the strategy at that meeting.

Having been immersed in the strategy for months, executives vastly overestimate its clarity to their team members. What seems obvious in the executive suite often seems rather nebulous on the ground floor. Concepts like “customer-centric innovation,” “digital transformation,” or “operational excellence” may ring true during an executive offsite, but become ambiguous when employees have to interpret them in terms of daily tasks and responsibilities.

This misalignment is amplified when the primary strategy communication channel is a top-down, single broadcast. Leadership presents the plan at an all-hands meeting and assumes that the organization is aligned. The reality is that hearing a message doesn’t automatically mean it’s understood or that it can be translated effectively and consistently by teams across the organization.

In fact, employees often nod along to strategic slogans without the faintest idea what those priorities mean for their own day-to-day decisions. The strategy may exist conceptually, but fails operationally.

A similar factor that leads to the communications vacuum is the physical distance between leaders and the everyday work of employees. When leaders are many layers removed from the operational challenges employees face, strategic priorities that appear to make sense at the top of the organization can represent competing pressures or constraints that immediately impact employees’ day-to-day lives.

The outcome is a hidden, often unacknowledged, alignment gap. The leadership team thinks the message has been sent; the employees are trying to operationalize on the basis of various assumptions and local departmental concerns. Over time, this divergence causes the organization to veer off track, subtly (and not so subtly).

The Communication Illusion

Inseparably linked to this point is what experts sometimes call the “communication illusion.” This illusion occurs when the process of transmitting information is mistaken for genuine communication.

In many organizations, communication about strategy feels like a transactional process: emails are sent out, presentations are made, meetings are convened, and documents are distributed. When these actions have been completed, leadership feels a sense of accomplishment and confidence that the organization is now informed.

The problem is that communication in a company, especially when it concerns strategy or planning, requires more than simply delivering information in a clear pattern. That information has to be interpreted properly.

Employees interpret incoming information through their own frame of reference: their day-to-day workloads, anxieties, preconceived notions, prior assumptions about strategy, and personal interpretation of leadership messages. An announcement that appears transparent to leaders can create questions or ambiguities for teams trying to make sense of how a new strategy affects their existing jobs.

The communication illusion is often exacerbated when leaders focus on what’s changing rather than why it matters or how employees should adapt their behaviour. This results in fragmenting information instead of clearly articulating what employees need to do. 

Moreover, while it might seem that repeating a strategic message over and over should strengthen it, overexposure to an unchanging message can result in noise fatigue, and the strategic communication is largely ignored because it is not grounded in operational reality.

True strategic communication is not a one-time information download. It requires continuous clarification and dialogue across all levels of the organization so that individuals can have their questions answered and connect the strategy to their immediate reality effectively.

The Middle Management Bottleneck

Middle managers have the unenviable task of ensuring that strategy translates from executive directives to operational execution, and of managing their team members’ day-to-day performance & deadlines.

In theory, middle managers serve as the vital bridge between strategic vision and tactical reality; in practice, they too often become the dreaded bottleneck.

For middle managers, the core problem is overwhelming work. 

In periods of organizational change and strategic refocus, they are expected to digest the new priorities while keeping the rest of the organization functioning. In essence, they are on the hook to translate murky directives, reconcile inconsistent messages, patch up wobbly goal patterns, and protect their teams from disruption at a time when the organization is anything but stable. The immediate, pressing deadlines facing their teams become an all-consuming focus, overshadowing the strategic priorities set in more distant leadership circles.

This situation is perpetuated because middle managers, much like other employees, are not always as strategically clear as their leadership teams assume. They receive high-level messages that lack clarity or support, and then are expected to deliver a coherent, motivating message to their teams. When managers are unclear or uncertain, this inconsistency will inevitably permeate their departments and teams, seeping through the cracks of understanding and creating a pool of misinformation that everyone eventually dips their toes into.

Middle managers also become the recipients of much of the frustration and confusion generated by strategic changes. They must absorb employees’ anxieties and criticisms before mediating them to leadership. Without sufficient support from above, middle managers quickly become demotivated and disengaged (a fact that is rarely recognized by many organizations). Middle management may arguably be the most crucial element for strategic execution, yet they often receive the least strategic investment.

The Trouble with Inconsistent Leadership and Changing Goals

Even the best communication strategies break down when leadership behaviours are inconsistent. People don’t just hear what leaders say; they also hear what leaders value over time. 

1) Frequent, rapid shifts in leadership priorities undermine trust.

Organizations often create confusion by introducing new initiatives before existing ones are settled or their goals are clearly achieved. One quarter focuses on innovation, the next on efficiency, the next on the customer, then costs are paramount, followed by innovation again. The cycle often continues before the impact of prior change can be truly measured or experienced.

While the leader may see these moves as the ability to respond to a dynamic marketplace, for employees, they simply feel chaotic.

Problems arise because teams are confused about what’s important, always waiting for the next shift, and never really owning a goal. This undermines the sense of strategic urgency, as employees expect the initiative to be replaced at some point.

2) It also undermines accountability. 

Leadership can’t be surprised or disappointed when team members don’t stick with or finish objectives that, within a quarter, are no longer considered strategically relevant. The result can be organizations that celebrate the start of initiatives, but rarely finish them.

3) Finally, this causes fatigue. 

Employees are tired of adapting to change only to find the rules shifting. They are emotionally disengaging from new directives, believing they will not endure, and will quickly revert to business as usual as soon as possible.

Inconsistency also shows up in smaller gestures. You might encourage collaboration while rewarding individual performance, tell employees it’s okay to fail when introducing innovation, or tell employees you expect long-term thinking but also require immediate results. 

Employees notice this in a heartbeat, and when a leader’s actions are not aligned with their message, trust begins to wither. People eventually look to leadership to tell them what they’re interested in through actions rather than words, making a coherent strategy impossible.

Strategic Fatigue Caused by Endless Pivots

While agility is clearly needed to operate in today’s marketplace, it is different than continuous organizational pivoting. Frequent organizational pivoting causes what is termed strategic fatigue, the mental and emotional exhaustion many employees feel due to endless, incessant change.

Strategic fatigue doesn’t normally start immediately. Often, a change effort begins with an air of excitement and optimism as employees are drawn to ambitious new targets. However, over time, as change becomes perpetual, the novelty wears off, and weariness takes hold.

A common cause of strategic fatigue is that organizations launch new transformation initiatives without ensuring old ones are implemented and evaluated thoroughly. Employees are expected to adopt new processes, new priorities, new systems, and new performance expectations, all within very compressed time frames. With time spent re-evaluating old ways of working and integrating new ways, the employees get lost in translation.

Over time, this can push employees to withdraw from new initiatives psychologically. They will begin investing less of themselves in the change effort because their prior experience with continuous change has taught them not to expect results. Productivity can fall, and innovation capacity can decline due to a lack of the mental bandwidth required for rapid, continuous change. In essence, organizations are too tired and too focused on doing to really get any better.

When these constant pivots lead to burnout, some leaders attribute it to general resistance to change, when in reality, employees are willing to change if it is done purposefully and is coherent and sustainable. 

The true killer of change is inconsistency

Sustainable, effective change relies on both adaptability and stability. Without it, organizations may quickly burn out the people tasked with implementing the strategy.

Final Thoughts

As much as we are led to believe, most organizations don’t have difficulty coming up with a strategy and availing themselves of intelligent leadership. 

Those aspects are plentiful; however, what is not plentiful is execution and human alignment. 

Most executives underestimate how tenuous alignment is, while many overestimate the importance of an intelligent strategy or detailed communication, and underestimate the effect of overwhelming middle management and too-rapid, frequent change. 

When all of these factors combine, it creates a state where employees no longer know where the team stands, managers are overburdened, objectives & goals get muddied and lobbed together in a mish-mash fashion, and strategy can disconnect from the organization, without anyone really noticing until it’s too late. The solution, curiously,  isn’t more communication, but more intent

The most successful organizations are those whose clarity makes their strategy meaningful and achievable, consistency prevents it from eroding, and reinforcement sustains the learning necessary to apply it. This requires patience and alignment among people across the entire organization, and without this, even the best-laid strategy can fail unnoticed.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Bridging the gap between strategy and execution requires more than intent—it requires the right frameworks and capabilities. Enroll in the Certified Strategy and Business Planning Professional and Practitioner program by The KPI Institute to learn how to align strategy, planning, and performance for meaningful organizational results.

THE KPI INSTITUTE

The KPI Institute’s 2026 Agenda is now available! |  The latest updates from The KPI Institute |  Thriving testimonials from our clients |