How Sharpening Standards Set the Game-Winning Plan for Employee Management
In the game of basketball, a well-defined playbook sets the foundation for a winning team. The same principle applies to nurturing a workplace culture. Without a strong framework, workplace culture can feel like a chaotic, uncoordinated game. According to Eric Lynn, Senior Learning Manager at Microsoft, establishing clear standards creates an environment where employees understand expectations, perform at their best, and contribute to a culture of excellence. He is also a professional coach at Microsoft’s Customer and Partner Solutions (MCAPS) organization, where his role is integral to supporting the company’s Growth Mindset Culture.
Eric’s background in sports administration instilled in him a deep understanding of teamwork, strategy, and leadership, which he further refined through a Master of Science in Organizational Management and Leadership. With over 17 years of experience in learning and development, he shares in this interview a unique perspective on how training programs, strong leadership, and a results-driven approach can drive long-term business success.
From your own professional experience, what key elements are indispensable in cultivating a performance-oriented culture, and how have they influenced your work?
I think in a performance-based culture, it is imperative to have transparency and clear standards. If you can understand what the guidelines are and how to achieve them, the more consistent and impactful the team’s performance will be.
Strategic priorities today are being shaped by trends such as the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), reskilling efforts, and economic pressures, as highlighted in the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs 2025 report. In light of these trends, should we anticipate shifts in organizational culture? And if so, what might those changes look like?
Yes, and I believe we will be moving to a more team-oriented performance culture. Two reasons why a strong team culture is important in today’s workforce are that it helps improve our use of new technologies and enables us to work together to handle pressures, both economic and industry-based. While we tend to focus on individual performance, the leader of a work group or a senior-level employee will also be held accountable if they don’t have clear standards. When the rules are inconsistent, employees will be unable to make the impact needed to overcome the potential cuts brought about by the cultural shift.
In light of ongoing workplace shifts, which cultural trends do you think are having the greatest impact on increasing work productivity and individual performance?
The use of AI as a true partner for an individual will be a big transition for productivity and performance. I see that being able to work alongside this technology opens up and improves productivity. From a performance standard, it really allows individuals to focus on more important and pressing work.
In today’s agile work environment, sustainability continues to be a key strategic consideration. In your view, how can organizations truly embed sustainability values in their culture, beyond just meeting regulatory compliance?
I feel that diversity plays a significant role in how company members see and support each other. The more they embrace different perspectives and collaborate effectively, the stronger their ability to work together toward shared goals. In our organization, we avoid unnecessary travel and wasted time associated with in-person training events. Travel for a global workforce can not only create financial instability but also increase emissions and generate additional waste, such as food waste. It is important to balance return on investment with time spent to ensure we are acting as responsible global and financial stewards of the business.
As organizations adapt to these cultural and strategic changes, what key actions can leaders take to make sure performance isn’t just maintained but enhanced?
Leaders need to be very clear on what the standards are for the team and organization. While there shouldn’t be a big departure between these, it is so important in a world riddled with changes that there is always a foundation on what the goal is for the team and organization. Leaders also need to foster a mindset wherein everyone counts; if a member of the team is struggling, we need to think about why and what can be done to help. It may be solved through training or having a conversation at the individual level, but I feel more and more that we need to have honest conversations around role changes and work scope.
A major factor influencing workplace culture and performance is work structure. How do you see changes such as the back-to-office push influencing employee motivation and effectiveness? In your opinion, is a remote or office-based approach better?
I find that if standards are clear and individuals are given autonomy, their workplace won’t matter— they will strive for success and contribute regardless. However, I do feel that a lack of trust can be a significant factor affecting employees. Personally, I find a hybrid situation impactful and beneficial in managing expectations and more.
Given these structural and cultural shifts, what methods have you observed that organizations use to assess employee performance nowadays, and do these methods really help people achieve better results?
Organizations with a true team culture deliver the best team performance. When a company has subjective standards, it can be hard to take things seriously. Overall, I feel that the technology industry is taking a strong approach to accountability. I do like this approach, but in order for it to truly be effective and impactful, leaders must have a strong team culture with clear standards.
How can organizations make a smooth transition from the traditional rating and ranking evaluation system to agile employee performance management?
Having clear standards and providing solid coaching can uphold teams and employees. It is important that leaders remain curious and always review the process and the structure before jumping to the individual. I think organizations that do that and help those around them and see how they contribute can create a good environment centered around healthy performance management.
Looking at what works in practice, what is one tool, method, or approach that has proven most effective in your organization for driving employee performance?
The principles around curiosity and coaching have been good at helping to remove judgment and inspection. One example involved a manager who had an opportunity to improve performance. Rather than inspecting or placing blame on the organization, we focused on key learnings that could guide future improvements and help carry the work forward. This approach demonstrates a vested interest in continuous improvement and in building examples of how this can work in the future.
Asking thoughtful questions such as “What about…?” or “That’s a great idea—have we considered…?” helps to better understand the mindset behind decisions and fosters a more constructive approach to problem-solving.
While performance incentives like targets and bonus systems are designed to drive results, they can sometimes lead to undesirable attitudes and consequences. How can organizations avoid the negative impacts of target setting at the employee level?
It has to come down to a strong correlation beyond the reward. Employees need to understand that it is about leaving an impact that helps improve a group versus not. While employees can receive a bonus for their performance, it really comes down to how the organization and the company feel.
Over the years, what’s been the most surprising or counterintuitive lesson you’ve learned about organizational culture, and how has it shaped your approach to leadership?
I have learned the importance of transparency, which means having clear standards of what excellence looks like in top performance. I have seen this effectively used by senior leaders by being very clear on expectations, allowing their teams to align with those standards. For example, this includes guidance on how to influence for impact, the key competencies required at each level, and the structural framework needed to make it work. I think of it like a motion offense in basketball—the more structure you give your players, the more ability and autonomy you give them to make the decisions.
**********
Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in Performance Magazine Issue No. 32, 2025 – Employee Performance Edition.
